33 tools on the map. 8 are wired today, each with a page saying exactly what it reads and what it writes.

Annual as the default plan, with the monthly price beside it

Select annual by default in the plan chooser and show the monthly-equivalent price next to it, without moving the upgrade rate down.

Example experiment, not a resultPricingPLG SaaSRisk mediumConversion
This experiment is written to show a pattern. Nothing on this page is a measurement.

Problem

The plan chooser defaults to monthly and the annual saving is a footnote. A visitor who would have taken the annual plan is shown the monthly one first and has to find the toggle to see the other price.

Evidence

A default is the option most people end up with, because changing it is work and the default reads as the recommendation. Showing the annual plan's price as a monthly equivalent lets the two plans be compared on the same unit, which is the comparison a visitor is trying to make. The risk is a framing that only shifts the mix without changing whether people upgrade at all, which is why the primary metric here is the upgrade rate and not the annual share. Nothing on this page reports a result.

Cohort

Visitors to the pricing page who are signed in on a free plan. Visitors who are not signed in are excluded, because they cannot upgrade from the page, and workspaces on a paid plan are excluded, because the chooser is not their next step.

Hypothesis

Defaulting to annual with the monthly-equivalent price shown raises the share of annual plans chosen without lowering the upgrade rate, because the default carries the recommendation and the equivalent price keeps the comparison honest.

Intervention

Control
The plan chooser opens on monthly billing, with an annual toggle and the saving noted under it.
Variant
The plan chooser opens on annual billing with the monthly-equivalent price on each plan, the monthly toggle beside it, and the same plans and prices in both arms.

Primary metric

Name
Upgrade rate from the pricing page
Definition
The share of eligible pricing page visitors who start a paid plan
Window
30 days from the first eligible visit
Secondary: Annual share of new upgrades
The share of new paid plans that are billed annually, 30 days from the first eligible visit.

Guardrails

Upgrade rate
Must not drop. The primary metric, held as a guardrail against a framing that only shifts the mix
Refund requests within 30 days
Must not rise. Refund requests per hundred new paid plans in their first 30 days
Cancellation within the first cycle
Must not rise. The share of new paid plans cancelled before their first renewal

Expected impact

This is an example. No expected impact is stated because there is no evidence to state one from.

Traffic plan

Allocation
50 to 50 on eligible pricing page visitors
Eligibility
Signed-in free plan visitors reaching the pricing page while the flag is on, assigned once by workspace
Minimum sample
Pricing pages see fewer visitors than signup screens and upgrade rates are low, so this is the slowest kind of test to resolve; size it before it starts and do not run it at a traffic where the sample is months away.

Implementation notes

The chooser's default billing period and the price display change behind the customer's existing feature flag. Plans, prices and billing logic are untouched: the sandbox this product works in excludes price changes, and this experiment is presentation only. Exposure is recorded when the chooser renders.

Decision rule

Ship when the upgrade rate's interval clears zero or holds at the planned sample with every guardrail holding, and annual share has moved. Revert on a refund or cancellation breach. Otherwise continue to the planned sample without peeking.

Give us one funnel.

Twenty five minutes, about how you run experiments today. No access, no commitment.